spdan od

Home | The Peace Maker | test - main | test | Preserving Wood | Housing: Sod Igloo | Chickens: Permaculture Feed | Storing Nails | Security: Analysis of a Mugging | Tengwar | Havamal | Tribal: Tribal Dynamics - Abstract | Alaska: Subsistence Homesteading | Alaska: Agriculture Industry in Alaska | Recipes | Alaska: Major Ag Product Categories | Alaska: Seeds | Tribal: Sacred Enclosures | Model Constitution | Bog Iron | Stock and Drop | Age of Salvage Socities | Child Rearing: In Favor of Sheltering | 4 Billion | Planning for a Post-Oil Economy | Peak Oil and the Problem of Infrastructure | Food Storage | Book List | Oil Press | 100 Items That Disappear First | Cooking Heating and Lighting | Emergency Grain Mill | Outdoor Oven | Hobo Stove | Sharpening | Grain | Growing Feed | Reproductive | Childbirth | Abatis | Self-Sufficiency for Six | Homemade Cosmetics | Dutch Oven | 120/Village | Pests | Brewing | Links | Weapons: Making a Sling | Weapons: Slingshot 1 | Weapons: Slingshot 2 | Weapons: Slingshot 2 | Construction: Building Masonry Cookstoves | Heating: Emergency Wood Heat | Heating: Solar Heating Plan for Any Home | 10 Steps to Localization | Surviving In The City | Tribal: Modern Asatru/Germanic | German Shepherd ears | Alternative Lighting: Plant Oils and Waxes | Enlightened Survivalism | Quarterstaff | How Cheaply We Could Live | Life After The Crash | What To Do? | Survival Steps/Individual Level | 21 Strategies for Creating an Emergency Fund | Where to Live/Collapse Survival | Collapse on a Budget Part I | Collapse Survival on a Budget Part II | Collapse Survival on a Budget Part III | Commandments of Saving Money | Natural Remedies | Household Tips | How To Plan For An Emergency | Coming Collapse: A Community Checklist | Cap and Ball | Emergency Supplies/Kits | How To Prepare for an Emergency | Straw Bale on a Budget | Probable Timeline | Off Road | Storing Gasoline | Urban Invisibility | Pet Health/Nutrition | Zeer Pot | Rabbits | Making Charcoal

Tribal: Sacred Enclosures

Good Evil and Wholeness: Enclosures and The World

by Swain Wodening Canote

The concept of *wh- "that which is a part of the gods' realms" was related to other concepts revolving around how the ancient Heathens viewed society and the law. Hastrup in her book addresses this concept of "separateness" between that of a husbandman's farm and the wild lands outside it and expands this explanation to Heathen society itself.

The important point is that in our period a structural and semantic opposition was operative between "inside" and "outside" the society-as-law, allowing for a merging of different kinds of beings in the conceptual "wild." This anti-social space was inhabited by a whole range of spirits...landsvttir "spirits of the land," huldufolk "hidden people," jtnar "giants," trlls "trolls," and lfar "elves"...all of them belonged to the "wild" and it was partly against them that one had to defend ones-self... In this way the secure, well-known and personal innangards was symbolically separated from the dangerous unknown and nonhuman wild space outside the fence, tangards.

As Heathen familiar with our own cosmology, we know this paradigm not to be entirely correct. In truth, what the ancient Heathens truly saw was a series of enclosures comprising even larger enclosures. Thus individuals comprised the enclosure of a farmstead, several farmsteads com-prised a godord and all the godhords, the Icelandic state. In most ancient times, individuals made up families, families made up clans or kindreds, clans or kindreds made up tribes, the tribes made up Middangeard. Middangeard and the other eight abodes made up the multiverse and were held in the world tree Yggdrasil. Hastrup points out later in her book:

Horizontally the cosmos was divided into Mgar and tgardR. Mgar was the central space..inhabited by men (and gods), while tgardR was found outsidethe fence .

This view of the universe as a series of enclosures governed nearly every socio-political factor of an ancient tribesman's life and extended beyond a socio-political philosophy into the very theology of ancient Heathenry. At the base of all of these enclosures was the individual. An individual was part of a mgd "a family" and as an individual held certain responsibilities towards that family. He or she was expected to contribute to wergeld should another family member commit a crime, avenge any fellow family members wronged, defend the family's enclosures from encroachment, and generally contribute to the common good of the family. As an individual he or she possessed men, his or her own spiritual energy, and a fetch inherited from some ancestor. Individuals determined their own Wyrd through their own actions, each action resulting in an appropriate outcome according to a personal law that individual had laid down throughout his or her life time. All of an individual's actions had to be in keeping with that which is good. That which is good was determined by the tribe as a whole, and generally came down to "that which did not harm the tribe or one of its individuals," but actively contributed to the tribe as a whole. The word good, which has cognates in every Germanic tongue, derives from Old English gd which in turn derived from proto-Germanic *gad- "to unite, bring together." It is related to the word gather and referred to the collectiveness of the family and tribe.

Individuals are rarely treated as being solely responsible for their deeds in the ancient law codes. According to Bill Griffiths, "Compensation itself would be collectable and payable to a kin-group rather than an individual, suggesting communal responsibility." In time, an individual's lord or guild would be held responsible (notably after the Conversion when Heathen custom was dying), but in the earliest times it was the family or kindred that was responsible for the individual's actions. The mgd was the institution that enforced the law for its members. Should a mgd fail in preventing a member from committing a crime, it was then held responsible for making compensation to the victim's family. If the mgd held that their family member was innocent, they could then take the matter to thing, or fight the ensuing blood feud. Even should the culprit of the crime flee, the family was still responsible for half the victim's wergeld under some Anglo-Saxon law codes.

A notable absence in the ancient law codes are laws dealing with crimes within a kindred. These crimes were dealt with by the mgd itself without outside interference. This was because the mgd formed a legal unit in and of its self. A glance at the Icelandic sagas will quickly reveal the strength of the family in this respect. The strength of the family as a legal unit also extended into the spiritual realm. Just as the individual possesses a fetch, the family possesses a kin-fetch called in Old Icelandic the kinfylgja, and as an individual possesses mgen, so too does a mgd. Similarly the collective actions of a family comprised that family's wyrd. Families were the most important enclosure within a tribe. While within Anglo-Saxon England there were Hundred courts, and Iceland, the Godords, that came between the families and the tribal assembly itself, it was the family that wielded the most power.

While families were the principle enforcers of the law, they were not its creators. In a metaphysical sense, every individual lays down law as personal wyrd, as does every family. But the laws that governed individuals' behavior were generally decided upon by the tribe as a whole in various mels and things. The od or tribe was the enclosure, the innangards. The law created by the od was customary in nature. The tribal assemblies did not "make laws" so much as rule on how existing customs or traditions would apply to a given situation (for example the dispute between two families over a boundary). The customs or traditions of a od were considered its wyrd, its doom, the actions that as a collective whole the od had laid down in the Well of Wyrd. Kirsten Hastrup maintains that "In Iceland 'the social' was coterminous with 'the law'...it was eloquently expressed in the notion of vr lg ('our law'). By logical inference 'the wild'...was coterminous with 'non-law.'" This philosophy was expressed when the Heathens and Christians in Iceland declared themselves r lgum "out of law" with each other at the Icelandic Althing of 1000 CE.18 Ancient Germanic law was not connected to political boundaries as modern law is now, it was by tribal membership, by blood. That is, an ancient Jute would only be tried under Jutish law, not by the law of the od he had committed his or her crime in. The tribe was the law, was that which was good, was the innangard, and all outsidethe tribe was tangards for all practical purposes. The tribe as an innangard served as "contained space" for deeds to be done. It is the sort of contained space Bauschatz is talking about in his book the The Well and the Tree:

For the Germanic peoples, space as it is encountered and perceived in the created worlds of men and other beings, exists, to any significant degree only as a location or container for the occurrence of action...The container is action, whether of individual men, of men acting in consort or in opposition, of men and monsters, or whatever. In all cases, immediate actions are discontinuous and separable deriving power and structure from the past.

These deeds done within the innangard of the tribe by its tribesmen are its law, its orlay. A od is no different than a mgd or an individual in that it too lays down its own wyrd in the Well of Wyrd. This wyrd or doom is the law of the tribe. Just as there are spiritual correspondences between the individual and the family, so too are there between the tribe and the family. The tribal leader was seen as possessing the mgen of the tribe, and for the tribe to remain successful, it had to obey its laws. Failure to do so would result in a loss of mgen. The Anglo-Saxon Miercinga Rce believes that our law, orlay, wyrd, and mgen operate on the very same principles. The same principles that the ancient Heathens may have believed in.

Here we are brought back to the discussion of *wh-. The tribe in ancient times was the largest social enclosure of Mankind. In a sense, that which was *wh-, was also outsideits realm, outsidethe innangards of Mankind, tho not a part of the "wilds," the tgard. Not all outsidethe realm of Man was thought threatening. In sooth, much of what lies outsideMan's realm is helpful, esp. the Gods. Perhaps then we have struck upon the primary reason for worship, to build a bridge between the enclosures of the gods and the enclosures of Man.