by Ran Prieur
> December 19, 2004
> 1. Abandon the world. The world is the enemy of the
Earth. The "world as we know it" is a deadly parasite on the biosphere. Both cannot survive, nor can the world survive without
the Earth. Do the logic: the world is doomed. If you stay on the parasite, you die with it. If you move to the Earth, and
it survives in something like its recent form, you can survive with it.
> Our little world is doomed because
it's built on a foundation of taking from the wider world without giving back. For thousands of years we've been going into
debt and calling it "progress," exterminating and calling it "development," stealing and calling it "wealth," shrinking into
a world of our own design and calling it "evolution." We're just about done. We're not just running out of cheap oil -- which
is used to make and move almost every product, and which gives the average American the energy equivalent of 200 slaves <http://dieoff.org/page137.htm>.
We're also running out of topsoil, without which we need oil-derived fertilizers to grow food; and forests <http://www.rainbowbody.net/Finalempire/FEchap4.htm>,
which stabilize climate and create rain by transpiring water to refill the clouds; and ground water, such as the Ogallala
aquifer under the Great Plains, which could go dry any time now. We're running out of room to dump stuff in the oceans without
killing them, and to dump stuff in the atmosphere without wrecking the climate, and to manufacture carcinogens without all
of us getting cancer. We're coming to the end of global food stockpiles <http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/083104G.shtml>,
and antibiotics that still work, and our own physical health, and our own mental health, and our grip on reality, and our
will to keep the whole game going. Why do you think so many Americans are looking forward to "armageddon" or the "rapture"?
We hate this shitty world and we want to blow it up.
> In the next five or ten years, the US military will
be humiliated, the dollar will collapse, the housing bubble will burst, tens of millions of Americans will be destitute, food,
fuel, and manufactured items will get really expensive, and most of us will begin withdrawal from the industrial lifestyle.
SUV's will change their function from transportation to shelter. We will not be able to imagine how we ever thought calories
were bad. Smart people will stop exterminating the dandelions in their yard and start eating them. Ornamental gardens will
go the way of fruit hats and bloomers. In the cities, pigeon populations will decline.
> This is not the "doom"
scenario. I'm not saying anything about death camps, super-plagues, asteroid impacts, solar flares, nuclear war, an instant
ice age, or a runaway greenhouse effect. This is the mildest realistic scenario, the slow crash: energy prices will rise,
the middle class will fall into the lower class, economies will collapse, nations will fight desperate wars over resources,
in the worst places people will starve, and climate disasters will get worse. Your area might resemble the botched conquest
of Iraq, or the depression in Argentina, or the fall of Rome, or even a crusty Ecotopia. My young anarchist friends are already
packing themselves into unheated houses and getting around by bicycle, and they're noticeably happier than my friends with
full time jobs. We just have to make the mental adjustment. Those who don't, who cling to the world they grew up in, numbing
themselves and waiting for it all to blow over, will have a miserable time, and if people die, they will be the first. Save
some of them if you can, but don't let them drag you down. The first thing they teach lifeguards is how to break holds.
> 2. Abandon hope. I don't mean that we stop trying, or stop believing that a better world is possible, but
that we stop believing that some factor is going to save us even if we do the wrong thing. A few examples:>
Jesus is coming. If you believe the Bible, Jesus told us when he was coming back to save us. He said, "This generation shall
not pass." That was 2000 years ago. Stop waiting for that bus and get walking.
> The Mayan calendar is ending.
Some people who scoff at Christian prophecies still manage to believe something equally religious and a lot less specific
about what's going to happen. At least Jesus preached peace and enlightenment -- the Mayans were a warlike people who crashed
their civilization by cutting down the forests of the Yucatan and exhausting their farmland. That's what we should be studying,
not their calendar and its alleged message that a better world is coming very soon and with little effort on our part. Now
the Mayan calendar gurus will say that it does take effort and we have a choice to go either way, but go back to 1988 and
read what 2004 was supposed to look like, and it's obvious that we've already failed.
> Technology will save
us. If it does, it will be something we don't even recognize as "technology" -- permaculture or orgonomy or water vortices
or forest gardening <http://www.agroforestry.co.uk/forgndg.html> or quantum consciousness or the next generation of
the tribe. It will not be a new germ killer or resource extractor or power generator or anything to give us what we want while
exempting us from being aware and respectful of other life. Anything like that will just dig us deeper in the same hole.
> The system can be reformed. Yes, and it's also not against the laws of physics for us to go back in time and prevent
the industrial age from ever happening. Ten, twenty, thirty years ago the ecologists said "we have to turn it around now or
it will be too late." They were right. And not only didn't we turn it around, we sped it up: more cars with worse efficiency,
more toxins, more CO2, more deforestation, more pavement, more lawns, more materialism, more corporate rule, more weapons,
more war and love of war, more secrets, more lies, more callousness and cynicism and short-sightedness. Now we're in so deep
that politicians right of Nixon are called "liberal" and the Green Party platform is both totally inadequate and politically
absurd. Our little system is not going to make it.
> Also, there's a time lag between smokestacks and acid
rain, between radioactivity and cancer, between industrial toxins and birth defects, between atmospheric imbalance and giant
storms, between deforestation and drought, between soil depletion and starvation. The disasters we're getting now are from
the relatively mild stuff we did years or decades ago, before SUV's and depleted uranium and aspartame and terminator seeds
and the latest generation of factory farms <http://www.themeatrix.com/>. Even if we could turn it around tomorrow, what's
coming is much worse.
> We're not strong enough to destroy nature. Oddly, this argument almost always invokes
the word "hubris," as in, "You are showing hubris, or excessive pride, in thinking that by lighting this forest on fire to
roast a hot dog, I will burn the forest down. Don't you know humans aren't capable of burning down a forest? Shame on you
for your pride."
> In fact, we've already almost finished killing the Earth. The deserts of central and southwest
Asia were once forests -- ancient empires cut down the trees and let the topsoil wash off into the Indian Ocean. In North
America a squirrel could go tree to tree from the Atlantic to the Mississippi, and spawning salmon were so thick in rivers
and streams that you couldn't row a boat through them, and the seashores were rich with seals, fishes, birds, clams, lobsters,
whales. Now they're deserts populated only by seagulls eating human garbage, and nitrogen fertilizer runoff has made dead
zones in the oceans, and atmospheric carbon dioxide is increasing oceanic acidity <http://www.independent-media.tv/item.cfm?fmedia_id=8411&fcategory_desc=Environment>>
, which may dissolve the shells of the plankton. If the plankton die, it's all over.
> Maybe we can't kill
absolutely everything, but we are on the path to cutting life on Earth down to nothing bigger than a cockroach, and we will
do so, and all of us will die, unless something crashes our system sooner and only kills most of us.
3. Drop Out. (See my essay How To Drop Out <http://ranprieur.com/essays/dropout.html>.) Dropping out of the present
dominant system has both a mental and an economic component that go together like your two legs walking. It's a lot of steps!
Maybe you notice that you hate your job, and that you have to do it because you need money. So you reduce expenses, reduce
your hours, and get more free time, in which you learn more techniques of self-sufficiency and establish a sense of identity
not dependent on where you get your money. Then you switch to a low-status low-stress job that gives you even more room to
get outside the system mentally. And so on, until you've changed your friends, your values, your whole life.
The point I have to make over and over about this process, and this movement, is that it's not about avoiding guilt, or reducing
your ecological footprint, or being righteous. It's not a pissing contest to see who's doing more to save the Earth -- although
some people will believe that's your motivation, to justify their own inertia. It's not even about reducing your participation
in the system, just reducing your submission and dependence: getting free, being yourself, slipping out of a wrestling hold
so you can throw an elbow at the Beast.
> This world is full of people with the intelligence, knowledge, skills,
and energy to make heaven on Earth, but they can't even begin because they would lose their jobs. We're always arguing to
change each other's minds, but nobody will change if they think their survival depends on not changing. Every time you hear
about a whistleblower or reporter getting fired for honesty and integrity, you can be sure that they already had a support
network, or just a sense of their own value, outside of the system they defied. Dropping out is about fighting better. Gandalf
has to get off Saruman's tower!
> 4. You are here to help. In the culture of Empire, we are trained
to think of ourselves as here to "succeed," to build wealth and status and walls around ourselves, to get what we desire,
to win in games where winning is given meaning by others losing. It is a simple and profound shift to think of ourselves instead
as here to help -- to serve the greatest good that we can perceive in whatever way is right in front of us.
You don't have to sacrifice yourself for others, or put others "above" you. Why is it so hard to see each other as equals?
And it's OK to have a good time. In fact, having a good time is what most helping comes down to -- the key is that you're
focused on the good times of all life everywhere including your "self," instead of getting caught up in egocentric comparison
games that aren't even that fun.
> Defining yourself as here to help is a prerequisite for doing some of the
other things on this list properly. If you're here to win you're not saving anything but your own wretched ass for a few additional
years. If you're dropping out to win you're likely to be stepping on other outsiders, instead of throwing a rope to bring
more people out alive. And as the system breaks down, people here to win will waste their energy fighting each other for scraps,
while people here to help will build self-sufficient communities capable of generating what they need to survive.
> In the real world, being here to help is easier and less stressful, because you will frequently be in a situation
where you can't win, but you will almost never be in a situation where there's nothing you can do to help. Being here to win
only makes sense in an artificial world rigged so you can win all the time. Thousands of years ago only kings were in that
position, and they reacted by massacring all enemies and bathing in blo> od. Now, through a perfect conjunction of Empire
and oil energy, we just put the entire American middle class in that position for 50 years. No one should be surprised that
we're so stupid, selfish, cowardly, and irresponsible. But younger generations are already getting poorer and smarter.
> 5. Learn skills. Readers sometimes ask for my advice on surviving the crash -- should they buy guns, canned
food, water purifiers, gold? I always tell them to learn skills. You know the saying: get a fish, eat for a day; learn to
fish, eat for a lifetime. (Just don't take it too literally -- there might not be any fish left!)
> The most
obvious useful skills would include improvising shelter from materials at hand, identifying and preparing wild edibles, finding
water, making fire, trapping animals, and so on. But I don't think we're going all the way to the stone age. There will also
be a need for electrical work, medical diagnosis, surgery, optics, celestial navigation, composting, gardening, tree propagation,
food preservation, diplomacy, practical chemistry, metalworking, all kinds of mechanical repair, and all kinds of teaching.
As the 15th century had the Renaissance Man, we're going to have the Postapocalypse Man or Woman, someone who can fix a bicycle,
tan a hide, set a broken bone, mediate an argument, and teach history.
> Even more important are some things
that are not normally called skills, but that make skill-learning and everything else easier: luck, intuition, adaptability,
attentiveness, curiosity, physical health, mental health, the ability to surf the flow. Maybe the most fundamental is what
they call "being yourself" or "waking up." Most human behavior is based neither on logic nor intuition nor emotion, but habit
and conformity. We perceive, think, and act as we've always done, and as we see others do. This works well enough in a controlled
environment, but in a chaotic environment it doesn't work at all. If you can just get 10% of yourself free of habit and conformity,
people will call you "weird." 20% and they'll call you a genius, 30% and they'll call you a saint, 40% and they'll kill you.
> 6. Find your tribe. We minions of Empire think of ourselves as individualists, or as members of silly fake
groups -- nations, religions, races, followers of political parties and sports teams, loyal inmates of some town that's the
same as every other. In fact we're all members of a giant mad tribe, where the relationships are not cooperative and open,
but coercive, exploitative, abusive, and invisible. If we could see even one percent of the whole picture, we would have a
> You may feel like you want to do it alone, but you have never done it alone. To survive the breakdown
of this world and build a better one, you will have to trade your sterile, insulated links of money and law for raw, messy
links of friendship and conflict. The big lie of postapocalypse movies like Omegaman and Mad Max is that the survivors will
be loners. In the real apocalypse, the survivors will be members of multi-skilled well-balanced cooperative groups.
> I think future tribes are already forming, even on the internet, even among people thousands of miles apart. I think
the crash will be slow enough that we'll have plenty of time to get together geographically.
Get on some land. This might seem more difficult than the others, yet most people who own land have not done any of the other
things -- probably because buying land requires money which requires subservience to a system that makes you personally powerless.
I suggest extreme frugality, which will give you valuable skills and also allow you to quickly save up money. You probably
have a few more years.
> If you don't make it, it's not the end of the world -- oh wait -- it is>
the end of the world! But you still might know someone with room on their land, or someone might take you in for your skills,
or if you have a tribe one of you will probably come up with a place in the chaos. And if not, there will be a need for sur>
vivors and helpers in the cities and suburbs. So don't force it.
> If you do get land, the most valuable thing
it can have is clean surface water, a spring or stream you can drink from. Acceptable but less convenient would be a well
that doesn't require electricity, or dirty surface water, which you can filter and clean through sand and reed beds. At the
very least you need the rainfall and skills to catch and store enough rainwater to drink and grow food. (The ancient Nabateans
did it on less than four inches of rain a year.) Then you'll need a few years to learn and adjust and get everything in order
so that your tribe can live there year-round, even with no materials from outside. With luck, it won't come to that.
> 8. Save part of the Earth. When I say "the Earth," I mean the life on its surface, the biosphere, as many
species and habitats as possible, connected in ways that maximize abundance and complexity -- and not just because humans
think it's pretty or useful, but because all life is valuable on its own terms. We like to focus on saving trophy animals
-- whales, condors, pandas, salmon, spotted owls -- but most of them aren't going to make it, and we could save a lot more
species if we could put that attention into habitats and whole systems.
> So how do you save habitats and whole
systems? You can try working through governments, but at the moment they're ruled by corporations, which by definition are
motivated purely by short term increase-in-exploitation, or "profit." You can try direct physical action against the destroyers,
but it has yet to work well, and as the world plunges to the right I think we'll see more and more activists simply killed.
> My focus is direct positive action for the biosphere: adopting some land, whether by owning or squatting or stealth,
and building it into a strong habitat: slowing down the rainwater, composting, mulching, building the topsoil, no-till gardening,
scattering seed balls <http://www.seedballs.com/>, planting trees, making wetlands -- a little oasis where the tree
frogs can hide and migrating birds can rest, where you and a few species can wait out the crash.
> Tom Brown
Jr. mentions in one of his books that the patch of woods where he conducts his wilderness classes, instead of being depleted
by all the humans using it for survival, has turned into an Eden, because his students know how to tend it. Some rain forest
environments, once thought to be random wilderness, have turned out to be more like the wild gardens of human tribes, orders
of magnitude more complex than the soil-killing monoculture fields of our own primitive culture.
> Humans have
the ability to go beyond sustainability, to live in ways that increase the richness of life on Earth, and help Gaia in ways
she cannot help herself. This and only this justifies human survival.
> It requires a new set of skills. A
good place to start is the permaculture movement. Sadly, in the present dark age the original books are rare, and classes
are so expensive that the knowledge is languishing among the idle rich when it should be offered free to the world. But the
idle poor can still find the books in libraries, and many of the techniques are simple. What it comes down to is seeing whole
systems and paying attention and innovating, driven by the knowledge that sustainability is only the middle of the road, and
there's no limit to how far we can go beyond it.
> 9. Save human knowledge. When people of this age
think about knowledge worth saving, they usually think about belief in the Cartesian mechanical philosophy, that dead matter
is the basis of reality, and about techniques for rebuilding and using machines that dominate and separate us from other life.
I'd like that knowledge to die forever, but I don't think it works that way. Humans or any other hyper-malleable animal will
always be tempted by the Black Arts, by techniques that trade subtle harm for flashy good and feed back into themselves, seducing
us into power, corruption, and blindness.>
> Our descendants will need the intellectual artifacts to avoid
this -- artifacts we have barely started to develop even as the Great Bad Example begins to fall. In 200 years, when they
are brushing seeds into baskets with their fingers, and a stranger appears with a new threshing machine that will do the same
thing with less time and effort, they will need to say something smarter than "the Gods forbid it" or "that is not our Way."
They will need the knowledge to say something like:
> "Your machine requires the seed to be planted alone and
not interspersed with perennials that maintain nitrogen and mineral balance in the soil. And from where will the metal come,
and how many trees must be cut down and burned to melt and shape it? And since we cannot build the machine, shall we be dependent
on the machine-builders, and give them a portion of our food, which we now keep all for ourselves? Do you not know, clever
stranger, that when any biomass is removed from the land, and not recycled back into it, the soil is weakened? And what could
we do with our "saved" time, that would be more valuable and pleasurable than gathering the seed by hand, touching and knowing
every stalk and every inch of the land that feeds us? Shall we become allies of cold metal that cuts without feeling, turning
our hands and eyes to the study of machines and numbers until, severed from the Earth, we nearly destroy it as our ancestors
did, making depleted uranium and polychlorinated biphenyls and cadmium batteries that even now make the old cities unfit for
living? Go back to your people, and tell them, if they come to conquer us with their machines, we will fight them in ways
the Arawaks and Seminoles and Lakota and Hopi and Nez Perce never imagined, because we understand your world better than you
do yourself. Tell your people to come to learn."